Home

Aug. 18th, 2007

A

St. Gregory Palamas. Homily on the Transfiguration






St. Gregory Palamas.
Byzan­tine fresco. 
1371.
The house of prayer (Παρεκκλήσίον) of St. Unselfish persons.
Holy Monastery of Vatopedion, Holy Mount Athos


St. Gregory Palamas. Homily on the Transfiguration
 
For an explanation of the present Feast and understanding of its truth, it is necessary for us to turn to the very start of today's reading from the Gospel: "Now after six days Jesus took Peter, James and John his brother, and led them up onto a high mountain by themselves" (Mt 17:1).
First of all we must ask, from whence does the Evangelist Matthew begin to reckon with six days? From what sort of day be it? What does the preceding turn of speech indicate, where the Savior, in teaching His disciples, said to them: "For the Son of Man shall come with his angels in the glory of His Father," and further: "Amen I say to you, there are some standing here who shall not taste death, until they have seen the Son of Man coming in His Kingdom" (Mt 16:27-28)? That is to say, it is the Light of His own forthcoming Transfiguration which He terms the Glory of His Father and of His Kingdom.
The Evangelist Luke points this out and reveals this more clearly saying: "Now it came to pass about eight days after these words, that He took Peter and John and James, and went up the mountain to pray. And as He prayed, His countenance was altered, and His raiment became a radiant white" (Lk 9:28-29). But how can the two be reconciled, when one of them speaks definitively about the interval of time as being eight days between the sayings and the manifestation, whereas the other (says): "after six days?"
There were eight on the mountain, but only six were visible. Three, Peter, James and John, had come up with Jesus, and they saw Moses and Elias standing there and conversing with Him, so altogether there were six of them. However, the Father and the Holy Spirit were invisibly with the Lord: the Father, with His Voice testifying that this was His Beloved Son, and the Holy Spirit shining forth with Him in the radiant cloud. Thus, the six are actually eight, and there is no contradiction regarding the eight. Similarly, there is no contradiction with the Evangelists when one says "after six days," and the other says "eight days after these words."
But these twofold sayings as it were present us a certain format set in mystery, and together with it that of those actually present upon the Mount. It stands to reason, and everyone rationally studying in accordance with Scripture knows that the Evangelists are in agreement one with another. Luke spoke of eight days without contradicting Matthew, who declared "after six days." There is not another day added on to represent the day on which these sayings were uttered, nor is the day on which the Lord was transfigured added on (which a rational person might reasonably imagine to be added to the days of Matthew).

Jul. 31st, 2007

A

The Emperor Leo VI, the Wise (886-912), prostrated before Christ. Mosaic of Hagia Sophia

Over the Imperial Gate from the narthex to the church Leo VI, the Wise (886-912), is thus shown prostrated at the feet of Christ with medallions of the Virgin and an Archangel above. The Archangel no doubt symbolizes the belief that the chuch of Hagia Sophia was built with divine aid while Angels watched.



 

Ο αυτοκράτορας Λέων Στ΄ ο Σοφός γονυπετής μπροστά στο Χριστό. Στα μετάλλια η Παναγία και ο αρχάγγελος Γαβριήλ. (9ος αιώνας

Giving incorruptible Holy Sacrament to us in the communion after sacring was postulated by the Church Fathers. For instance in his Mt hom. 82 (83), 5 St. John Chrysostom speaks: «...let us approach this table and the nipple of the spiritual cup...like nursing children let us eagerly draw out the grace of the Spirit, for to share in the divinity of Christ is to be in communion also with the Father and the Holy Spirit, who share the same divine nature. So to receive the eucharist is to receive the Holy Spirit» (PG 58, 744 (= CPG § 4424)). In Ioh hom. 46 (47), 4: «From this table springs up a fountain that sends forth spiritual rivers... Many are the streams of that fountain which the Paraclete sends forth, and the Son is the mediator» (PG 59, 261-262 (= CPG § 4425)).
 
By ancient tradition only Emperor could enter the sanctuary to offer his gifts and receive communion as it was canonized by canon 69 of the Quinisext Council «in Trullo» in AD 691/2 (The Council in Trullo Revisited / eds.G. Nedungatt, M. Featherstone. (Kanonika 6). Rome, 1995. P. 151 = Mansi 11, 969). On Trullo and its canons, see: Nedungatt-Featherstone and V. Laurent. L’oeuvre canonique du Concile en Trullo (691-692), source primaire du droit de l’église orientale // Revue des études byzantines 23 (1965). Р. 7-41. On the imperial communion, see: R.F. Taft. The Byzantine Imperial Communion Ritual // Ritual and Art: Essays for Christopher Walter.ed. Pamela Armstrong. London, 2003; R.F. Taft . A History of the Liturgy of St. John Chrysostom. Vol. II: The Great Entrance. A History of the Transfer of Gifts and Other Preanaphoral Rites of the Liturgy of St. John Chrysostom (OCA 200). Rome, 1978. P. 26-31; F.J. Dölger. Kaiser Theodosius der Große und Bischof Ambrosius von Mailand in einer Auseinandersetzung zwischen Predikt und Meßliturgie // Antike und Christentum 1 (1929). P. 54-65.
 
In accord to the 10th-century De ceremoniis to hold the crown and chlamyde it were used liturgical tables during the imperial coronation and wedding rites (De cerimoniis I, 39 (30) - Le Livre des cérémonies de Constantin Porphyrogénète. Texte I-II. ed. A. Vogt. Paris, 1935, 1939). About the origins of these communion table (antimesion) one can see the anonymous 8/9th-century Narratio de S. Sophia §16, describing the sanctuary of Justinian’s Great Church, which says the Emperor «set up on the presbytery four silver tables (trapezas) on columns, and these, too, he gilded» (Scriptores originum Constantinopolitanarum. ed.T. Preger. (Bibliotheca Scriptorum Graecorum et Romanorum Teubneriana, Scriptores Graeci). Leipzig, 1901-1907. P. 94).
 
As described for the Hagia Sophia Christmas liturgy (Le Typicon de la Grande Église. Ms.Sainte-Croix n°. 40, Xe siècle. Introduction, texte critique, traduction et notes. ed. J. Mateos. 2 vols. (OCA 165-166). Rome, 1962-1963. Vol. I. P. 154-159) the Emperor was summoned to communion after the kiss of peace,
«The Emperor goes again to the metatorion, and at the time of the divine communion, the master of ceremonies signals the praepositus, and the praepositus [signals] the Emperor, and he goes out, preceded by the above-mentioned [officials], and when he is before the patriarch to communicate in the immaculate Body and Blood of Our Lord Jesus Christ, two porters hold a cloth spread out, and after receiving the precious gift in his hands, he kisses the patriarch and after descending the platform [of the communion antimension] and making the sign of the cross three times, he communicates in the Holy sacrament. Then he mounts the same platform again and the porters spread the cloth under him, and after receiving the eucharistic wine from the patriarch, he descends, and having prayed, both [the Emperor and the patriarch] bow to each other, then turning, he retires to the metatorion and dines with the patricians and dignitaries whom he will have invited» (De cerimoniis I, 32 (23) - Le Livre des cérémonies de Constantin Porphyrogénète. Texte I. ed. A. Vogt. Paris, 1935. P. 124).



A

July 2008

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Tags

Syndicate

RSS Atom
Powered by LiveJournal.com